Interpret individual and team behaviour in contribution contexts (ti2119)

Interpret individual and team behaviour in contribution contexts (ti2119)

logo

Contribution Exchange

info@contributionexchange.org

Making contribution visible, trusted, and portable.

Contribution Exchange is an international organization headquartered in Ottawa, Canada, building shared infrastructure for recognizing learning and capability developed through contribution.

Through an international federation of National Contribution Exchanges, Contribution Exchange stewards common standards for work-based learning, professional practice, recognition, and quality assurance. Its systems help organizations structure, validate, and recognize learning developed through work, community, civic, cultural, and other purposeful contributions.

Contribution Exchange also stewards the Work-Based Learning Numbering System (WBLNS®) and PathLedger®, providing interoperable infrastructure to index learning standards, record verified contributions, and make trusted evidence of capability portable across organizations, sectors, and borders.

Tags:

behaviour, CIM, contribution, individual, interpret, item, learning, management, organizational, training, work-based
This Training Item focuses on recognizing individual behaviour, team dynamics, role expectations, culture, communication patterns, and group conditions that affect contribution and performance.

Criteria

Contribution recognized

The contributor interprets individual and team behaviour in contribution contexts through a situated workplace or civic/community contribution that produces a usable output for another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Learning Goal

  • LG022 — Learners will develop their ability to interpret individual and team behaviour to contribute to effective people and culture practices.

Learning Outcomes

  1. LO064 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify individual, team, role, or cultural factors affecting contribution.
  2. LO065 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to describe how team dynamics or organizational culture influence coordination or performance.
  3. LO066 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to summarize people or team implications for management, coordination, or group action.

Aligned Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours

  • K001 — Knowledge: Understands organizational structures and management functions in order to contribute to coordinated activity.
  • K008 — Knowledge: Understands organizational behaviour and team dynamics in order to contribute to effective people, culture, and performance practices.
  • S001 — Skill: Identifies, classifies, and summarizes management issues, structures, processes, and desired outcomes using available organizational information to support decisions.
  • B003 — Behaviour: Demonstrates systems awareness by connecting people, functions, resources, processes, and outcomes in contribution contexts.
  • B006 — Behaviour: Demonstrates constructive collaboration by supporting inclusion, cooperation, and shared responsibility in group or stakeholder settings.

Acceptable Artifact Element

AE006 — Journal or Logbook Entries

Evidentiary purpose: Makes the contributor’s situated role and use of LO064, LO065, LO066 visible through a naturally occurring journal or logbook entries.

Minimum characteristics: - A genuine workplace or civic/community context. - An attributable contributor role. - A usable output aligned to the selected Learning Outcomes. - Sufficient context for AC001 and AC002 validation.

Workplace example

A workplace observation log, team participation log, role-clarity reflection log, meeting observation entry, culture observation entry, communication reflection, or contribution log that records people, team, role, or culture factors affecting contribution.

Civic/community example

A civic/community observation log, volunteer participation log, committee reflection entry, event team observation, stakeholder interaction log, culture observation entry, or contribution log that records people, team, role, or culture factors affecting contribution.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Assist — Develops the artifact with defined responsibility and periodic guidance from an appropriate supervisor, sponsor, or community lead.
  • Complexity: Assist — Interprets varied information, constraints, or stakeholder considerations in a situated contribution context.
  • Contribution scope: Assist — Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Assessment Components

AC001 — STARR Reflection

Redo (R): The STARR Reflection is missing, is not attributable to the contributor, does not sufficiently address one or more required STARR elements, or does not establish a credible connection to LO064, LO065, LO066 and the aligned KSBs.

Pass (P): The STARR Reflection is complete, situated, and attributable. It addresses Situation: The contributor identifies a workplace or civic/community setting where individual behaviour, team dynamics, role expectations, culture, communication patterns, or group conditions affected contribution.; Task: The contributor explains the people issue, role concern, cultural condition, team dynamic, communication need, coordination objective, or performance-related issue being considered.; Action: The contributor describes how they identified individual, team, role, or cultural factors; described how team dynamics or culture influenced coordination or performance; and summarized people or team implications for management, coordination, or group action.; Result: The contributor describes the improved understanding, role clarity, coordination support, team awareness, culture insight, communication improvement, or group action support that resulted from the contribution.; Relevance: The contributor explicitly connects the reflection to LG022, LO064–LO066, and the Training Unit-Level KSBs K001, K008, S001, B003, and B006. It explicitly connects the contribution to LO064, LO065, LO066 and the aligned KSBs K001, K008, S001, B003, B006.

AC002 — Contribution Witness Statement

Redo (R): The Contribution Witness Statement is absent, unattributable, provided by a person unable to confirm the contribution context, or does not sufficiently confirm the contributor’s role, situated contribution, relationship to LO064, LO065, LO066, and claimed KSB alignment.

Pass (P): An identifiable and contextually appropriate witness provides a credible statement that addresses Context Confirmation: The witness confirms the contributor participated in a workplace or civic/community context involving people, roles, team dynamics, culture, communication, coordination, or performance conditions.; Contribution Confirmation: The witness confirms the contributor contributed to identifying, summarizing, documenting, communicating, or clarifying people or team dynamics.; LO Confirmation: The witness confirms the contribution reasonably relates to individual/team/cultural factors, team dynamics or culture, and implications for management or group action.; KSB Confirmation: The witness confirms the contribution supports developmental alignment to K001, K008, S001, B003, or B006 and does not contradict the claimed alignment.; Credibility: The witness is identifiable and has sufficient relationship to the contribution context to confirm the evidence.

Completion requirement

Both AC001 and AC002 must achieve Pass (P). A Redo (R) on either component returns the Training Item for revision. Distinction is not available at Training Item level.

Your RPL Submission Must Include:

1. STARR Reflection Statement A structured, first-person account that addresses all Learning Outcomes (LIs) and related Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours (KSBs) through a real experience.

2. Contribution Witness Statement An endorsement from someone who directly observed or received the written product. Please provide:

Full Name

Email Address

Their Role and Relationship to You (e.g., “Project Lead,” “Board Chair,” “Small Business Owner”)

3. Submission Evaluation Once your STARR reflection is sent to your contribution witness, a Contribution Exchange staff member will review the file for completion, record your evidence for PathLedger, and you will receive your badge.

Your RPL Submission Must Include:

1. STARR Reflection Statement A structured, first-person account that addresses all Learning Outcomes (LIs) and related Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours (KSBs) through a real experience.

2. Contribution Witness Statement An endorsement from someone who directly observed or received the written product. Please provide:

Full Name

Email Address

Their Role and Relationship to You (e.g., “Project Lead,” “Board Chair,” “Small Business Owner”)

3. Submission Evaluation Once your STARR reflection is sent to your contribution witness, a Contribution Exchange staff member will review the file for completion, record your evidence for PathLedger, and you will receive your badge.

Please use the format: X0X 0X0 (ANA NAN)
**STARR FORMAT** ----- Use the following STARR format and ensure your story aligns with the Learning Goal (LG), all Learning Outcomes (LIs) and addresses each of the KSBs.
Situation: What was the setting or challenge?
Task: What did you need to communicate and why?
Action: How did you plan, write, revise, and format your communication?
Result: What was the impact or outcome?
Reflection: What did you learn? How did it build your writing capability and support collaboration or leadership?
Please provide a valid email address for your witness.
Please use the format - First Name Last Name.
Example: “Project Lead,” “Board Chair,” “Small Business Owner”
- or -

Powered by

CanCred Factory logo