Support Managerial Communication Processes (tu8683)

Support Managerial Communication Processes (tu8683)

logo

Contribution Exchange

info@contributionexchange.org

Making contribution visible, trusted, and portable.

Contribution Exchange is an international organization headquartered in Ottawa, Canada, building shared infrastructure for recognizing learning and capability developed through contribution.

Through an international federation of National Contribution Exchanges, Contribution Exchange stewards common standards for work-based learning, professional practice, recognition, and quality assurance. Its systems help organizations structure, validate, and recognize learning developed through work, community, civic, cultural, and other purposeful contributions.

Contribution Exchange also stewards the Work-Based Learning Numbering System (WBLNS®) and PathLedger®, providing interoperable infrastructure to index learning standards, record verified contributions, and make trusted evidence of capability portable across organizations, sectors, and borders.

Tags:

CIM, communication, contribution, learning, management, managerial, training, unit, work-based
This Training Unit develops managerial communication contribution across written communication, audience analysis, issue identification, supported argument, stakeholder influence, negotiation, and coordinated action. Participants demonstrate the ability to prepare communication artifacts that clarify issues, support decisions, influence stakeholders, and document negotiated or proposed next steps.

Criteria

Contribution recognized

Communicate management issues, arguments, outcomes, and negotiated decisions to stakeholders.

Training Unit structure

This Training Unit aggregates exactly three child Training Items:

  1. ti6998 — Prepare clear management communications (73.3.CA6532/ti6998D)
  2. ti0015 — Build supported arguments for management decisions (73.3.CA6532/ti0015D)
  3. ti5301 — Negotiate strategically toward desired outcomes (73.3.CA6532/ti5301D)

Completion requires two naturally occurring Artifact Elements that together provide substantial evidence across the three child Training Items.

Aggregated Learning Goals

  • LG004 — Learners will develop their ability to prepare clear management communications to contribute to stakeholder understanding and coordinated action.
  • LG005 — Learners will develop their ability to build supported arguments to contribute to informed management decisions.
  • LG006 — Learners will develop their ability to negotiate strategically to contribute to stakeholder alignment and agreed outcomes.

Aggregated Learning Outcomes

  1. LO010 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to plan a management communication for a defined audience and purpose.
  2. LO011 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to draft and format a management communication using appropriate structure and tone.
  3. LO012 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to revise a management communication for clarity, accuracy, and usefulness.
  4. LO013 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to isolate a problem and desired outcome in a management communication context.
  5. LO014 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to organize evidence to support a management argument.
  6. LO015 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to present a supported argument for stakeholder consideration.
  7. LO016 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify interests, constraints, and desired outcomes in a negotiation context.
  8. LO017 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to communicate options and trade-offs to support negotiation or stakeholder alignment.
  9. LO018 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to summarize a negotiated outcome, proposed agreement, or next step for stakeholders.

Aggregated Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours

  • S002 — Skill: Prepares management communications using audience, purpose, structure, and tone to support understanding, coordination, and action.
  • B002 — Behaviour: Demonstrates clear and respectful communication by adapting language, tone, and message structure to stakeholders and context.
  • K001 — Knowledge: Understands organizational structures and management functions in order to contribute to coordinated activity.
  • S014 — Skill: Coordinates stakeholders, resources, tasks, and information using action pathways to support implementation, delivery, or improvement.
  • S001 — Skill: Identifies, classifies, and summarizes management issues, structures, processes, and desired outcomes using available organizational information to support decisions.
  • S003 — Skill: Builds supported arguments using claims, evidence, reasoning, and stakeholder context to influence decisions and coordinated action.
  • K003 — Knowledge: Understands management information and evidence systems in order to contribute to informed planning, monitoring, and decision-making.
  • S004 — Skill: Negotiates strategically using interests, options, constraints, trade-offs, and agreed next steps to support stakeholder alignment.
  • B006 — Behaviour: Demonstrates constructive collaboration by supporting inclusion, cooperation, and shared responsibility in group or stakeholder settings.

Indicative Content

ti6998 — Prepare clear management communications

  • LO010 — Writing Process: Planning, drafting, revising, editing, formatting, organizing, and adapting communication for audience and purpose.
  • LO011 — Audience and Stakeholder Awareness: Stakeholder needs, audience expectations, tone, role authority, communication context, relationship dynamics, and information needs.
  • LO012 — Narrative and Message Design: Use of structure, sequencing, examples, context, and narrative logic to support understanding and influence.

ti0015 — Build supported arguments for management decisions

  • LO013 — Business Communication Forms: Emails, memos, briefing notes, reports, stakeholder updates, decision notes, meeting summaries, presentations, and communication packages.
  • LO014 — Problem and Outcome Isolation: Identification of issues, desired outcomes, stakeholder concerns, communication gaps, constraints, decision points, and action requirements.
  • LO015 — Supported Argument: Claims, evidence, reasoning, stakeholder context, implications, alternatives, recommendations, and defensible conclusions.

ti5301 — Negotiate strategically toward desired outcomes

  • LO016 — Negotiation and Alignment: Interests, options, constraints, trade-offs, agreement points, proposed next steps, relationship preservation, and stakeholder alignment.
  • LO017 — Coordination Through Communication: How communication supports shared understanding, role clarity, decision-making, implementation, and follow-through.
  • LO018 — Contextual Application: Workplace or civic/community settings where communication contributes to coordination, issue resolution, decision-making, negotiation, stakeholder alignment, or action.

Artifact Element 1

AE001 — Management and Technical Reports

Evidentiary purpose: Captures a written management communication that defines a management or coordination issue, identifies the intended audience, states the desired outcome, presents a supported argument, and recommends a decision, response, or next step. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence issue identification, management communication, supported argument, evidence use, and respectful stakeholder communication.

Minimum characteristics: - States why the communication is being prepared and what decision, action, understanding, agreement, or response it is intended to support. - Identifies the intended audience, stakeholder group, receiver, committee, team, client, decision-maker, or affected group. - Describes the contribution context and defines the management issue, coordination issue, communication gap, stakeholder concern, decision point, or problem requiring attention. - States the intended outcome, decision, response, agreement, action, clarification, change, or next step the communication seeks to support. - Presents the central message, claim, recommendation, position, or decision-support argument. - Provides evidence, examples, observations, management information, stakeholder input, data, context, or reasoning that supports the key message or argument. - Identifies the action, decision, response, meeting, agreement, follow-up, or next step requested or recommended. - Explains how the tone, structure, format, language, or message design was suited to the audience, purpose, context, and stakeholder relationship. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, revising, delivering, using, or supporting the communication.

Workplace example

A workplace-facing briefing note, issue memo, recommendation report, decision note, stakeholder message, management communication package, or communication report prepared for a defined workplace audience. The artifact must address a workplace management or coordination issue, identify the desired outcome, present evidence or rationale, and recommend a decision, response, or next step.

Civic/community example

A civic/community-facing briefing note, issue memo, committee recommendation, event decision note, stakeholder message, coordination communication package, or communication report prepared for a defined civic/community audience. The artifact must address a civic/community coordination or governance issue, identify the desired outcome, present evidence or rationale, and recommend a decision, response, or next step.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Apply — Frames and develops the artifact independently within agreed authority, seeking direction for material exceptions.
  • Complexity: Apply — Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output.
  • Contribution scope: Assist — Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Insufficient evidence conditions

  • required characteristics absent
  • role cannot be attributed
  • no credible situated use
  • required validation missing

Assessment Components

AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration

Redo (R): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is missing when yes or does not credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is present when yes, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a written management communication that defines a management or coordination issue, identifies the intended audience, states the desired outcome, presents a supported argument, and recommends a decision, response, or next step. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence issue identification, management communication, supported argument, evidence use, and respectful stakeholder communication.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation

Redo (R): Host Organization Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, delivering, or using the artifact.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Host Organization Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, delivering, or using the artifact.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a written management communication that defines a management or coordination issue, identifies the intended audience, states the desired outcome, presents a supported argument, and recommends a decision, response, or next step. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence issue identification, management communication, supported argument, evidence use, and respectful stakeholder communication.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation

Redo (R): Source Data / Record Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, stakeholder input, meeting records, observations, or source inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Source Data / Record Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, stakeholder input, meeting records, observations, or source inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a written management communication that defines a management or coordination issue, identifies the intended audience, states the desired outcome, presents a supported argument, and recommends a decision, response, or next step. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence issue identification, management communication, supported argument, evidence use, and respectful stakeholder communication.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

Artifact Element 2

AE002 — Presentations & Slide Decks

Evidentiary purpose: Captures a stakeholder-facing presentation that uses a supported argument to advance a proposed decision, negotiated outcome, or stakeholder alignment process. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence strategic negotiation logic, options and trade-offs, collaborative alignment, respectful stakeholder communication, and an agreed or proposed next step.

Minimum characteristics: - Identifies the topic, setting, audience, and communication purpose. - States the problem, opportunity, stakeholder concern, coordination issue, decision point, negotiation need, or alignment need. - States the desired outcome, agreement, decision, action, clarification, alignment result, or shared next step. - Identifies relevant stakeholder needs, interests, constraints, expectations, concerns, role responsibilities, or conditions affecting the proposed outcome. - Presents evidence, examples, observations, data, management information, stakeholder input, context, or reasoning that supports the argument or recommendation. - Presents relevant options, trade-offs, constraints, risks, benefits, alternatives, implementation implications, or decision consequences. - States the recommended action, proposed agreement, preferred option, negotiation position, stakeholder alignment position, or collaborative response. - Identifies the agreed next step, proposed next step, action owner, decision pathway, meeting, agreement point, follow-up requirement, or unresolved item. Where no agreement has been reached, the artifact must identify the proposed decision pathway or next step. - Explains how the presentation supports cooperation, inclusion, shared responsibility, respectful communication, or stakeholder participation. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, presenting, supporting, negotiating, facilitating, or using the presentation.

Workplace example

A workplace-facing presentation or slide deck prepared for a defined stakeholder audience to support a decision, agreement, issue resolution, negotiation, or alignment process. The artifact must identify the problem or opportunity, desired outcome, stakeholder interests or constraints, evidence or rationale, options and trade-offs, a recommended or negotiated position, and an agreed or proposed next step.

Civic/community example

A civic/community-facing presentation or slide deck prepared for a defined stakeholder audience to support a coordination decision, agreement, issue resolution, negotiation, or alignment process. The artifact must identify the problem or opportunity, desired outcome, stakeholder interests or constraints, evidence or rationale, options and trade-offs, a recommended or negotiated position, and an agreed or proposed next step.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Assist — Develops the artifact with defined responsibility and periodic guidance from an appropriate supervisor, sponsor, or community lead.
  • Complexity: Apply — Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output.
  • Contribution scope: Assist — Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Insufficient evidence conditions

  • required characteristics absent
  • role cannot be attributed
  • no credible situated use
  • required validation missing

Assessment Components

AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration

Redo (R): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is missing when yes or does not credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is present when yes, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a stakeholder-facing presentation that uses a supported argument to advance a proposed decision, negotiated outcome, or stakeholder alignment process. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence strategic negotiation logic, options and trade-offs, collaborative alignment, respectful stakeholder communication, and an agreed or proposed next step.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation

Redo (R): Host Organization Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, presenting, negotiating, facilitating, or using the artifact.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Host Organization Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, presenting, negotiating, facilitating, or using the artifact.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a stakeholder-facing presentation that uses a supported argument to advance a proposed decision, negotiated outcome, or stakeholder alignment process. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence strategic negotiation logic, options and trade-offs, collaborative alignment, respectful stakeholder communication, and an agreed or proposed next step.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC007 — Peer / Team Corroboration

Redo (R): Peer / Team Corroboration is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms contribution in collaborative activity where the artifact was produced by, presented to, or used within a team, committee, working group, stakeholder group, or coordinated activity.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Peer / Team Corroboration is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms contribution in collaborative activity where the artifact was produced by, presented to, or used within a team, committee, working group, stakeholder group, or coordinated activity.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a stakeholder-facing presentation that uses a supported argument to advance a proposed decision, negotiated outcome, or stakeholder alignment process. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence strategic negotiation logic, options and trade-offs, collaborative alignment, respectful stakeholder communication, and an agreed or proposed next step.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

Completion and result

  • Each Artifact Element is assessed through its own reposited Assessment Components.
  • Each required Assessment Component must achieve at least Pass (P) for its Artifact Element.
  • Both Artifact Elements must achieve Pass (P) or Distinction (D) to complete the Training Unit.
  • Any Redo (R) returns the Training Unit for revision.
  • Distinction is available only when the LMO reposits D criteria, and both Artifact Elements achieve D. D is not assumed or inferred.
  • Formal Assessment Methods are not used at TI or TU level; they are reserved for EPA/EA.

Your submission must include

  1. Artifact Element 1 — the artifact file and a short explanation of its context, your role, and how it was used.
  2. Artifact Element 2 — the artifact file and a short explanation of its context, your role, and how it was used.
  3. Contribution context — select pre-service or in-practice.
  4. Organization evaluator details — required for an in-practice submission.
  5. Artifact Authenticity Declaration (AC005) — required.

Both artifacts must arise naturally from workplace or civic/community contribution. Each artifact is assessed directly against its own Redo (R), Pass (P), and optional Distinction (D) criteria. Both must achieve P or D. If either receives R, the application is returned for revision and resubmission.

This TU application does not require a STARR Reflection or Contribution Witness Statement as separately graded Assessment Components.

Please use the format: X0X 0X0 (ANA NAN)
### Artifact Element 1 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports #### Evidentiary purpose Captures a written management communication that defines a management or coordination issue, identifies the intended audience, states the desired outcome, presents a supported argument, and recommends a decision, response, or next step. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence issue identification, management communication, supported argument, evidence use, and respectful stakeholder communication. #### Minimum characteristics - States why the communication is being prepared and what decision, action, understanding, agreement, or response it is intended to support. - Identifies the intended audience, stakeholder group, receiver, committee, team, client, decision-maker, or affected group. - Describes the contribution context and defines the management issue, coordination issue, communication gap, stakeholder concern, decision point, or problem requiring attention. - States the intended outcome, decision, response, agreement, action, clarification, change, or next step the communication seeks to support. - Presents the central message, claim, recommendation, position, or decision-support argument. - Provides evidence, examples, observations, management information, stakeholder input, data, context, or reasoning that supports the key message or argument. - Identifies the action, decision, response, meeting, agreement, follow-up, or next step requested or recommended. - Explains how the tone, structure, format, language, or message design was suited to the audience, purpose, context, and stakeholder relationship. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, revising, delivering, using, or supporting the communication. #### Acceptable examples - **Workplace:** A workplace-facing briefing note, issue memo, recommendation report, decision note, stakeholder message, management communication package, or communication report prepared for a defined workplace audience. The artifact must address a workplace management or coordination issue, identify the desired outcome, present evidence or rationale, and recommend a decision, response, or next step. - **Civic/community:** A civic/community-facing briefing note, issue memo, committee recommendation, event decision note, stakeholder message, coordination communication package, or communication report prepared for a defined civic/community audience. The artifact must address a civic/community coordination or governance issue, identify the desired outcome, present evidence or rationale, and recommend a decision, response, or next step. #### Required Experience Context - **Autonomy 3 — Apply:** Frames and develops the artifact independently within agreed authority, seeking direction for material exceptions. - **Complexity 3 — Apply:** Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output. - **Contribution scope 2 — Assist:** Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.
### Artifact Element 1 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports — Assessment #### Assessment criteria - **Redo (R):** R — The Artifact Element is incomplete, cannot be reliably attributed to the contributor, lacks credible situated use, omits one or more minimum characteristics, falls below a required Experience Context condition, or does not provide substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a written management communication that defines a management or coordination issue, identifies the intended audience, states the desired outcome, presents a supported argument, and recommends a decision, response, or next step. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence issue identification, management communication, supported argument, evidence use, and respectful stakeholder communication. - **Pass (P):** P — The Artifact Element is attributable to the contributor, arose through a credible workplace or civic/community contribution, meets all minimum characteristics and required Experience Context conditions, and provides substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a written management communication that defines a management or coordination issue, identifies the intended audience, states the desired outcome, presents a supported argument, and recommends a decision, response, or next step. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence issue identification, management communication, supported argument, evidence use, and respectful stakeholder communication. - **Distinction (D, optional):** Not reposited. Distinction is unavailable for this Artifact Element. #### Attestations - **AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration** — Required - **AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation** — Conditional #### Insufficient evidence includes - required characteristics absent - role cannot be attributed - no credible situated use - required validation missing
Upload Artifact Element 1 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports
Describe the setting, your role, the purpose of the artifact, how it was used, and the people or decision it supported.
### Artifact Element 2 — AE002 — Presentations & Slide Decks #### Evidentiary purpose Captures a stakeholder-facing presentation that uses a supported argument to advance a proposed decision, negotiated outcome, or stakeholder alignment process. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence strategic negotiation logic, options and trade-offs, collaborative alignment, respectful stakeholder communication, and an agreed or proposed next step. #### Minimum characteristics - Identifies the topic, setting, audience, and communication purpose. - States the problem, opportunity, stakeholder concern, coordination issue, decision point, negotiation need, or alignment need. - States the desired outcome, agreement, decision, action, clarification, alignment result, or shared next step. - Identifies relevant stakeholder needs, interests, constraints, expectations, concerns, role responsibilities, or conditions affecting the proposed outcome. - Presents evidence, examples, observations, data, management information, stakeholder input, context, or reasoning that supports the argument or recommendation. - Presents relevant options, trade-offs, constraints, risks, benefits, alternatives, implementation implications, or decision consequences. - States the recommended action, proposed agreement, preferred option, negotiation position, stakeholder alignment position, or collaborative response. - Identifies the agreed next step, proposed next step, action owner, decision pathway, meeting, agreement point, follow-up requirement, or unresolved item. Where no agreement has been reached, the artifact must identify the proposed decision pathway or next step. - Explains how the presentation supports cooperation, inclusion, shared responsibility, respectful communication, or stakeholder participation. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, presenting, supporting, negotiating, facilitating, or using the presentation. #### Acceptable examples - **Workplace:** A workplace-facing presentation or slide deck prepared for a defined stakeholder audience to support a decision, agreement, issue resolution, negotiation, or alignment process. The artifact must identify the problem or opportunity, desired outcome, stakeholder interests or constraints, evidence or rationale, options and trade-offs, a recommended or negotiated position, and an agreed or proposed next step. - **Civic/community:** A civic/community-facing presentation or slide deck prepared for a defined stakeholder audience to support a coordination decision, agreement, issue resolution, negotiation, or alignment process. The artifact must identify the problem or opportunity, desired outcome, stakeholder interests or constraints, evidence or rationale, options and trade-offs, a recommended or negotiated position, and an agreed or proposed next step. #### Required Experience Context - **Autonomy 2 — Assist:** Develops the artifact with defined responsibility and periodic guidance from an appropriate supervisor, sponsor, or community lead. - **Complexity 3 — Apply:** Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output. - **Contribution scope 2 — Assist:** Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.
### Artifact Element 2 — AE002 — Presentations & Slide Decks — Assessment #### Assessment criteria - **Redo (R):** R — The Artifact Element is incomplete, cannot be reliably attributed to the contributor, lacks credible situated use, omits one or more minimum characteristics, falls below a required Experience Context condition, or does not provide substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a stakeholder-facing presentation that uses a supported argument to advance a proposed decision, negotiated outcome, or stakeholder alignment process. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence strategic negotiation logic, options and trade-offs, collaborative alignment, respectful stakeholder communication, and an agreed or proposed next step. - **Pass (P):** P — The Artifact Element is attributable to the contributor, arose through a credible workplace or civic/community contribution, meets all minimum characteristics and required Experience Context conditions, and provides substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a stakeholder-facing presentation that uses a supported argument to advance a proposed decision, negotiated outcome, or stakeholder alignment process. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence strategic negotiation logic, options and trade-offs, collaborative alignment, respectful stakeholder communication, and an agreed or proposed next step. - **Distinction (D, optional):** Not reposited. Distinction is unavailable for this Artifact Element. #### Attestations - **AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration** — Required - **AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC007 — Contribution Use or Impact Confirmation** — Conditional #### Insufficient evidence includes - required characteristics absent - role cannot be attributed - no credible situated use - required validation missing
Upload Artifact Element 2 — AE002 — Presentations & Slide Decks
Describe the setting, your role, the purpose of the artifact, how it was used, and the people or decision it supported.
Full name of the authorized organization evaluator
Work email address of the authorized organization evaluator
Role, organization, and relationship to the contributor
### Completion decision - **Redo (R):** Any R on either Artifact Element returns the Training Unit for redo. - **Pass (P):** Both Artifact Elements achieve P or D and all required attestations are complete. - **Distinction (D):** Both Artifact Elements achieve D against approved LMO-reposited D criteria. AC003–AC007 are attestations. They confirm authenticity, context, domain, source, or use as applicable; they are not graded and do not own R, P, or D criteria. No formal Assessment Method is attached at TI or TU level.
- or -

Powered by

CanCred Factory logo