Support Financial Management Practices (tu6293)

Support Financial Management Practices (tu6293)

logo

Contribution Exchange

info@contributionexchange.org

Making contribution visible, trusted, and portable.

Contribution Exchange is an international organization headquartered in Ottawa, Canada, building shared infrastructure for recognizing learning and capability developed through contribution.

Through an international federation of National Contribution Exchanges, Contribution Exchange stewards common standards for work-based learning, professional practice, recognition, and quality assurance. Its systems help organizations structure, validate, and recognize learning developed through work, community, civic, cultural, and other purposeful contributions.

Contribution Exchange also stewards the Work-Based Learning Numbering System (WBLNS®) and PathLedger®, providing interoperable infrastructure to index learning standards, record verified contributions, and make trusted evidence of capability portable across organizations, sectors, and borders.

Tags:

CIM, contribution, financial, learning, management, support, training, unit, work-based
This Training Unit develops financial management contribution across financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio interpretation, financing considerations, capital/resource decisions, and evidence-informed financial analysis. Participants demonstrate the ability to prepare, interpret, and communicate financial information that supports planning, review, resource allocation, and management decision-making.

Criteria

Contribution recognized

Support financial planning, analysis, budgeting, forecasting, financing, and resource decisions.

Training Unit structure

This Training Unit aggregates exactly three child Training Items:

  1. ti5292 — Interpret financial planning and ratio information (73.3.CA6532/ti5292D)
  2. ti2027 — Prepare budgeting and forecasting information (73.3.CA6532/ti2027D)
  3. ti8988 — Compare financing and capital/resource considerations (73.3.CA6532/ti8988D)

Completion requires two naturally occurring Artifact Elements that together provide substantial evidence across the three child Training Items.

Aggregated Learning Goals

  • LG007 — Learners will develop their ability to interpret financial information to contribute to planning, monitoring, and management decision-making.
  • LG008 — Learners will develop their ability to prepare financial information to contribute to planning, review, and resource decisions.
  • LG009 — Learners will develop their ability to compare financial and resource implications to contribute to responsible management decisions.

Aggregated Learning Outcomes

  1. LO019 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to describe financial planning information within a management context.
  2. LO020 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify financial indicators, ratios, or evidence relevant to a management question.
  3. LO021 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to interpret financial information for planning, monitoring, or decision support.
  4. LO022 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify budget categories, assumptions, source data, or forecast inputs.
  5. LO023 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to prepare budget, forecast, cost, or financial planning information for review.
  6. LO024 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to summarize financial implications for a planning, monitoring, or resource decision.
  7. LO025 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify financing, cost, risk, or resource considerations relevant to a decision.
  8. LO026 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to compare financial options, constraints, or implications in a management scenario.
  9. LO027 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to present a supported financial conclusion or recommendation for stakeholder consideration.

Aggregated Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours

  • K003 — Knowledge: Understands management information and evidence systems in order to contribute to informed planning, monitoring, and decision-making.
  • K004 — Knowledge: Understands financial management concepts in order to contribute to planning, analysis, and resource decisions.
  • K007 — Knowledge: Understands accounting and financial reporting principles in order to contribute to interpretation, accountability, and decision support.
  • S005 — Skill: Interprets management information using relevant evidence, records, data, and context to support planning, monitoring, and decisions.
  • B004 — Behaviour: Demonstrates evidence-informed decision-making by using relevant information, analysis, and context when contributing to decisions.
  • S006 — Skill: Prepares financial information using appropriate calculations, assumptions, and source data to support planning, review, and resource decisions.
  • S003 — Skill: Builds supported arguments using claims, evidence, reasoning, and stakeholder context to influence decisions and coordinated action.
  • B005 — Behaviour: Demonstrates responsiveness to wider implications by considering legal, social, economic, financial, human, and operational consequences.

Indicative Content

ti5292 — Interpret financial planning and ratio information

  • LO019 — Financial Planning: Financial goals, planning cycles, resource needs, assumptions, constraints, decision points, and financial planning responsibilities.
  • LO020 — Financial Ratio Awareness: Basic ratio concepts, financial indicators, comparison over time, interpretation limits, and use of ratios to support management understanding.
  • LO021 — Evidence-Informed Financial Judgment: Use of relevant financial information, assumptions, calculations, comparison, and context to support decisions.

ti2027 — Prepare budgeting and forecasting information

  • LO022 — Budgeting: Budget categories, revenue and expense assumptions, budget preparation, budget monitoring, variance awareness, and resource allocation.
  • LO023 — Forecasting: Forecast inputs, assumptions, trends, projected revenue or costs, scenario thinking, and management use of forecasts.
  • LO024 — Financial Information and Records: Source records, accounting summaries, financial statements, budget worksheets, dashboards, cost information, funding information, and supporting evidence.

ti8988 — Compare financing and capital/resource considerations

  • LO025 — Financing Considerations: Short-term and long-term financing, debt, equity, working capital, repayment implications, affordability, and financing constraints.
  • LO026 — Capital and Resource Decisions: Cost, risk, feasibility, payback logic, resource investment, capital/resource requests, and decision-support information.
  • LO027 — Contextual Application: Workplace or civic/community settings where financial information contributes to planning, budget control, funding decisions, resource allocation, investment decisions, or financial accountability.

Artifact Element 1

AE003 — Project Documentation

Evidentiary purpose: Captures structured financial working documentation that prepares or organizes budget, forecast, ratio, cost, source-data, or decision-support information for review. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial preparation, source-data use, interpretation of financial information, and evidence-informed decision support.

Minimum characteristics: - Identifies the financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, monitoring, financing, capital/resource, or resource decision being supported. - Identifies the figures, assumptions, estimates, records, accounting information, budget categories, ratios, costs, revenue items, funding sources, or resource inputs used. - Provides the calculation, worksheet, comparison, forecast, ratio interpretation, cost estimate, budget summary, variance information, or financial working element used to support review. - Identifies key assumptions, constraints, timing factors, resource conditions, data gaps, source limitations, uncertainty, or interpretation limits. - Presents at least one option, comparison, scenario, variance, financing option, cost-risk factor, or capital/resource alternative. - Summarizes what the financial information suggests for planning, monitoring, resources, risk, feasibility, accountability, or management action. - Identifies the review point, decision-support implication, monitoring need, follow-up, question, recommendation, or next step supported by the documentation. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, updating, calculating, organizing, interpreting, reviewing, or using the financial documentation.

Workplace example

A workplace budget file, forecast worksheet, financial ratio worksheet, cost analysis, financial assumption log, resource planning tracker, capital/resource worksheet, variance tracker, or decision-support calculation file prepared for management review. The artifact must show the financial question, source information, assumptions, calculations or comparisons, and decision-support implications.

Civic/community example

A civic/community budget file, event forecast worksheet, funding assumption log, resource planning tracker, grant budget file, cost analysis, committee finance worksheet, capital/resource request worksheet, or decision-support calculation file prepared for governance or coordination review. The artifact must show the financial question, source information, assumptions, calculations or comparisons, and decision-support implications.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Assist — Develops the artifact with defined responsibility and periodic guidance from an appropriate supervisor, sponsor, or community lead.
  • Complexity: Apply — Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output.
  • Contribution scope: Assist — Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Insufficient evidence conditions

  • required characteristics absent
  • role cannot be attributed
  • no credible situated use
  • required validation missing

Assessment Components

AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration

Redo (R): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is missing when yes or does not credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is present when yes, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured financial working documentation that prepares or organizes budget, forecast, ratio, cost, source-data, or decision-support information for review. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial preparation, source-data use, interpretation of financial information, and evidence-informed decision support.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation

Redo (R): Source Data / Record Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, estimates, source documents, financial summaries, or organizational inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Source Data / Record Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, estimates, source documents, financial summaries, or organizational inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured financial working documentation that prepares or organizes budget, forecast, ratio, cost, source-data, or decision-support information for review. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial preparation, source-data use, interpretation of financial information, and evidence-informed decision support.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC004 — Domain Validator Statement

Redo (R): Domain Validator Statement is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact is technically plausible and appropriate within the financial management, accounting, or resource decision domain where the artifact includes financial calculations, ratios, source records, financing comparisons, or capital/resource implications.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Domain Validator Statement is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact is technically plausible and appropriate within the financial management, accounting, or resource decision domain where the artifact includes financial calculations, ratios, source records, financing comparisons, or capital/resource implications.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured financial working documentation that prepares or organizes budget, forecast, ratio, cost, source-data, or decision-support information for review. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial preparation, source-data use, interpretation of financial information, and evidence-informed decision support.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

Artifact Element 2

AE001 — Management and Technical Reports

Evidentiary purpose: Captures a financial management report that interprets financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio, financing, accounting, or capital/resource information and presents a supported conclusion or recommendation. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial management understanding, supported argument, wider implication awareness, and evidence-informed financial decision support.

Minimum characteristics: - Identifies the management or civic/community decision being supported and the purpose of the report. - Describes the financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, financing, capital/resource, reporting, or accountability context relevant to the decision. - Identifies the financial information, records, budget figures, forecast data, ratios, accounting summaries, financing options, costs, risks, or resource information reviewed. - Explains what the financial information means for the decision, including relevant calculations, trends, assumptions, cost-risk factors, comparisons, constraints, or interpretation limits. - Explains relevant financial, operational, legal, social, economic, human, stakeholder, resource, or accountability implications. - Identifies options, alternatives, trade-offs, risks, affordability considerations, feasibility issues, constraints, or resource consequences. - States the recommended action, conclusion, planning implication, decision-support position, or management consideration. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, interpreting, reviewing, communicating, recommending, or using the financial management report.

Workplace example

A workplace financial management report, briefing note, financing comparison memo, capital/resource decision report, business case summary, affordability note, financial planning summary, ratio interpretation note, or management recommendation. The artifact must interpret financial information and present implications for a workplace management or resource decision.

Civic/community example

A civic/community financial management report, committee briefing note, funding comparison memo, capital/resource request summary, affordability note, budget interpretation note, grant/funding recommendation, or governance decision report. The artifact must interpret financial information and present implications for a civic/community decision.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Apply — Frames and develops the artifact independently within agreed authority, seeking direction for material exceptions.
  • Complexity: Apply — Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output.
  • Contribution scope: Assist — Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Insufficient evidence conditions

  • required characteristics absent
  • role cannot be attributed
  • no credible situated use
  • required validation missing

Assessment Components

AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration

Redo (R): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is missing when yes or does not credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is present when yes, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a financial management report that interprets financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio, financing, accounting, or capital/resource information and presents a supported conclusion or recommendation. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial management understanding, supported argument, wider implication awareness, and evidence-informed financial decision support.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC004 — Domain Validator Statement

Redo (R): Domain Validator Statement is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact is technically plausible and appropriate within the financial management, accounting, financing, funding, or resource decision domain where the report interprets calculations, financial reporting information, source records, financing options, affordability, or capital/resource implications.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Domain Validator Statement is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact is technically plausible and appropriate within the financial management, accounting, financing, funding, or resource decision domain where the report interprets calculations, financial reporting information, source records, financing options, affordability, or capital/resource implications.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a financial management report that interprets financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio, financing, accounting, or capital/resource information and presents a supported conclusion or recommendation. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial management understanding, supported argument, wider implication awareness, and evidence-informed financial decision support.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation

Redo (R): Host Organization Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, interpreting, recommending, or using the artifact.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Host Organization Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, interpreting, recommending, or using the artifact.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a financial management report that interprets financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio, financing, accounting, or capital/resource information and presents a supported conclusion or recommendation. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial management understanding, supported argument, wider implication awareness, and evidence-informed financial decision support.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation

Redo (R): Source Data / Record Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, source documents, financial summaries, estimates, or organizational inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Source Data / Record Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, source documents, financial summaries, estimates, or organizational inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a financial management report that interprets financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio, financing, accounting, or capital/resource information and presents a supported conclusion or recommendation. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial management understanding, supported argument, wider implication awareness, and evidence-informed financial decision support.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

Completion and result

  • Each Artifact Element is assessed through its own reposited Assessment Components.
  • Each required Assessment Component must achieve at least Pass (P) for its Artifact Element.
  • Both Artifact Elements must achieve Pass (P) or Distinction (D) to complete the Training Unit.
  • Any Redo (R) returns the Training Unit for revision.
  • Distinction is available only when the LMO reposits D criteria, and both Artifact Elements achieve D. D is not assumed or inferred.
  • Formal Assessment Methods are not used at TI or TU level; they are reserved for EPA/EA.

Your RPL Submission Must Include:

1. STARR Reflection Statement A structured, first-person account that addresses all Learning Outcomes (LIs) and related Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours (KSBs) through a real experience.

2. Expert or Client Witness Statement An endorsement from someone who directly observed or received the written product. Please provide:

Full Name

Email Address

Their Role and Relationship to You (e.g., “Project Lead,” “Board Chair,” “Small Business Owner”)

3. Submission Evaluation Once your STARR reflection is sent to your expert or client witness, a Contribution Exchange staff member will review the file for completion and record your evidence for PathLedger, and you will receive your badge.

Please use the format: X0X 0X0 (ANA NAN)
### Artifact Element 1 — AE003 — Project Documentation #### Evidentiary purpose Captures structured financial working documentation that prepares or organizes budget, forecast, ratio, cost, source-data, or decision-support information for review. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial preparation, source-data use, interpretation of financial information, and evidence-informed decision support. #### Minimum characteristics - Identifies the financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, monitoring, financing, capital/resource, or resource decision being supported. - Identifies the figures, assumptions, estimates, records, accounting information, budget categories, ratios, costs, revenue items, funding sources, or resource inputs used. - Provides the calculation, worksheet, comparison, forecast, ratio interpretation, cost estimate, budget summary, variance information, or financial working element used to support review. - Identifies key assumptions, constraints, timing factors, resource conditions, data gaps, source limitations, uncertainty, or interpretation limits. - Presents at least one option, comparison, scenario, variance, financing option, cost-risk factor, or capital/resource alternative. - Summarizes what the financial information suggests for planning, monitoring, resources, risk, feasibility, accountability, or management action. - Identifies the review point, decision-support implication, monitoring need, follow-up, question, recommendation, or next step supported by the documentation. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, updating, calculating, organizing, interpreting, reviewing, or using the financial documentation. #### Acceptable examples - **Workplace:** A workplace budget file, forecast worksheet, financial ratio worksheet, cost analysis, financial assumption log, resource planning tracker, capital/resource worksheet, variance tracker, or decision-support calculation file prepared for management review. The artifact must show the financial question, source information, assumptions, calculations or comparisons, and decision-support implications. - **Civic/community:** A civic/community budget file, event forecast worksheet, funding assumption log, resource planning tracker, grant budget file, cost analysis, committee finance worksheet, capital/resource request worksheet, or decision-support calculation file prepared for governance or coordination review. The artifact must show the financial question, source information, assumptions, calculations or comparisons, and decision-support implications. #### Required Experience Context - **Autonomy 2 — Assist:** Develops the artifact with defined responsibility and periodic guidance from an appropriate supervisor, sponsor, or community lead. - **Complexity 3 — Apply:** Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output. - **Contribution scope 2 — Assist:** Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.
### Artifact Element 1 — AE003 — Project Documentation — Assessment #### Assessment criteria - **Redo (R):** R — The Artifact Element is incomplete, cannot be reliably attributed to the contributor, lacks credible situated use, omits one or more minimum characteristics, falls below a required Experience Context condition, or does not provide substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures structured financial working documentation that prepares or organizes budget, forecast, ratio, cost, source-data, or decision-support information for review. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial preparation, source-data use, interpretation of financial information, and evidence-informed decision support. - **Pass (P):** P — The Artifact Element is attributable to the contributor, arose through a credible workplace or civic/community contribution, meets all minimum characteristics and required Experience Context conditions, and provides substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures structured financial working documentation that prepares or organizes budget, forecast, ratio, cost, source-data, or decision-support information for review. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial preparation, source-data use, interpretation of financial information, and evidence-informed decision support. - **Distinction (D, optional):** Not reposited. Distinction is unavailable for this Artifact Element. #### Attestations - **AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration** — Required - **AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC004 — Domain Validator Statement** — Conditional #### Insufficient evidence includes - required characteristics absent - role cannot be attributed - no credible situated use - required validation missing
Upload Artifact Element 1 — AE003 — Project Documentation
Describe the setting, your role, the purpose of the artifact, how it was used, and the people or decision it supported.
### Artifact Element 2 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports #### Evidentiary purpose Captures a financial management report that interprets financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio, financing, accounting, or capital/resource information and presents a supported conclusion or recommendation. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial management understanding, supported argument, wider implication awareness, and evidence-informed financial decision support. #### Minimum characteristics - Identifies the management or civic/community decision being supported and the purpose of the report. - Describes the financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, financing, capital/resource, reporting, or accountability context relevant to the decision. - Identifies the financial information, records, budget figures, forecast data, ratios, accounting summaries, financing options, costs, risks, or resource information reviewed. - Explains what the financial information means for the decision, including relevant calculations, trends, assumptions, cost-risk factors, comparisons, constraints, or interpretation limits. - Explains relevant financial, operational, legal, social, economic, human, stakeholder, resource, or accountability implications. - Identifies options, alternatives, trade-offs, risks, affordability considerations, feasibility issues, constraints, or resource consequences. - States the recommended action, conclusion, planning implication, decision-support position, or management consideration. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, interpreting, reviewing, communicating, recommending, or using the financial management report. #### Acceptable examples - **Workplace:** A workplace financial management report, briefing note, financing comparison memo, capital/resource decision report, business case summary, affordability note, financial planning summary, ratio interpretation note, or management recommendation. The artifact must interpret financial information and present implications for a workplace management or resource decision. - **Civic/community:** A civic/community financial management report, committee briefing note, funding comparison memo, capital/resource request summary, affordability note, budget interpretation note, grant/funding recommendation, or governance decision report. The artifact must interpret financial information and present implications for a civic/community decision. #### Required Experience Context - **Autonomy 3 — Apply:** Frames and develops the artifact independently within agreed authority, seeking direction for material exceptions. - **Complexity 3 — Apply:** Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output. - **Contribution scope 2 — Assist:** Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.
### Artifact Element 2 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports — Assessment #### Assessment criteria - **Redo (R):** R — The Artifact Element is incomplete, cannot be reliably attributed to the contributor, lacks credible situated use, omits one or more minimum characteristics, falls below a required Experience Context condition, or does not provide substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a financial management report that interprets financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio, financing, accounting, or capital/resource information and presents a supported conclusion or recommendation. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial management understanding, supported argument, wider implication awareness, and evidence-informed financial decision support. - **Pass (P):** P — The Artifact Element is attributable to the contributor, arose through a credible workplace or civic/community contribution, meets all minimum characteristics and required Experience Context conditions, and provides substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a financial management report that interprets financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, ratio, financing, accounting, or capital/resource information and presents a supported conclusion or recommendation. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence financial management understanding, supported argument, wider implication awareness, and evidence-informed financial decision support. - **Distinction (D, optional):** Not reposited. Distinction is unavailable for this Artifact Element. #### Attestations - **AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration** — Required - **AC004 — Domain Validator Statement** — Conditional - **AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation** — Conditional #### Insufficient evidence includes - required characteristics absent - role cannot be attributed - no credible situated use - required validation missing
Upload Artifact Element 2 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports
Describe the setting, your role, the purpose of the artifact, how it was used, and the people or decision it supported.
Full name of the authorized organization evaluator
Work email address of the authorized organization evaluator
Role, organization, and relationship to the contributor
### Completion decision - **Redo (R):** Any R on either Artifact Element returns the Training Unit for redo. - **Pass (P):** Both Artifact Elements achieve P or D and all required attestations are complete. - **Distinction (D):** Both Artifact Elements achieve D against approved LMO-reposited D criteria. AC003–AC007 are attestations. They confirm authenticity, context, domain, source, or use as applicable; they are not graded and do not own R, P, or D criteria. No formal Assessment Method is attached at TI or TU level.
- or -

Powered by

CanCred Factory logo