Contribute to Practices of Organizational Behaviour (tu2524)

Contribute to Practices of Organizational Behaviour (tu2524)

logo

Contribution Exchange

info@contributionexchange.org

Making contribution visible, trusted, and portable.

Contribution Exchange is an international organization headquartered in Ottawa, Canada, building shared infrastructure for recognizing learning and capability developed through contribution.

Through an international federation of National Contribution Exchanges, Contribution Exchange stewards common standards for work-based learning, professional practice, recognition, and quality assurance. Its systems help organizations structure, validate, and recognize learning developed through work, community, civic, cultural, and other purposeful contributions.

Contribution Exchange also stewards the Work-Based Learning Numbering System (WBLNS®) and PathLedger®, providing interoperable infrastructure to index learning standards, record verified contributions, and make trusted evidence of capability portable across organizations, sectors, and borders.

Tags:

behaviour, CIM, contribution, learning, management, organizational, practice, training, unit, work-based
This Training Unit develops organizational behaviour practice by focusing on how people, teams, structures, communication patterns, motivation, engagement, conflict, change, and decision-making shape organizational life. Participants use repeated observation and reflection to identify behaviour patterns, role and structural influences, team dynamics, communication needs, and conditions that affect performance or cooperation. They then translate those observations into a coordinated action pathway that supports respectful communication, constructive collaboration, stakeholder alignment, and a positive, proactive work environment.

Criteria

Contribution recognized

Support effective people, team, culture, motivation, and organizational behaviour practices.

Training Unit structure

This Training Unit aggregates exactly three child Training Items:

  1. ti2119 — Interpret individual and team behaviour in contribution contexts (73.3.CA6532/ti2119D)
  2. ti7221 — Support motivation, cooperation, and team performance (73.3.CA6532/ti7221D)
  3. ti7398 — Communicate and coordinate through conflict or group issues (73.3.CA6532/ti7398D)

Completion requires two naturally occurring Artifact Elements that together provide substantial evidence across the three child Training Items.

Aggregated Learning Goals

  • LG022 — Learners will develop their ability to interpret individual and team behaviour to contribute to effective people and culture practices.
  • LG023 — Learners will develop their ability to support motivation, cooperation, and team performance in contribution contexts.
  • LG024 — Learners will develop their ability to communicate and coordinate constructively through conflict or group issues.

Aggregated Learning Outcomes

  1. LO064 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify individual, team, role, or cultural factors affecting contribution.
  2. LO065 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to describe how team dynamics or organizational culture influence coordination or performance.
  3. LO066 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to summarize people or team implications for management, coordination, or group action.
  4. LO067 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify motivation, cooperation, participation, or performance factors in a team context.
  5. LO068 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to support a people management practice that improves clarity, cooperation, or contribution.
  6. LO069 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to summarize an action pathway that supports team performance or shared responsibility.
  7. LO070 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify interests, concerns, or constraints in a conflict or group issue.
  8. LO071 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to communicate options or next steps using clear and respectful language.
  9. LO072 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to coordinate a constructive action pathway that supports cooperation or stakeholder alignment.

Aggregated Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours

  • K001 — Knowledge: Understands organizational structures and management functions in order to contribute to coordinated activity.
  • K008 — Knowledge: Understands organizational behaviour and team dynamics in order to contribute to effective people, culture, and performance practices.
  • S001 — Skill: Identifies, classifies, and summarizes management issues, structures, processes, and desired outcomes using available organizational information to support decisions.
  • B003 — Behaviour: Demonstrates systems awareness by connecting people, functions, resources, processes, and outcomes in contribution contexts.
  • B006 — Behaviour: Demonstrates constructive collaboration by supporting inclusion, cooperation, and shared responsibility in group or stakeholder settings.
  • K009 — Knowledge: Understands human resource management and labour relations concepts in order to contribute to people management and workplace cooperation.
  • S009 — Skill: Supports people management practices using role expectations, performance information, cooperation needs, and workplace or community context.
  • S014 — Skill: Coordinates stakeholders, resources, tasks, and information using action pathways to support implementation, delivery, or improvement.
  • B001 — Behaviour: Demonstrates professional judgment and accountability by acting ethically, responsibly, and transparently in management contribution contexts.
  • S002 — Skill: Prepares management communications using audience, purpose, structure, and tone to support understanding, coordination, and action.
  • S004 — Skill: Negotiates strategically using interests, options, constraints, trade-offs, and agreed next steps to support stakeholder alignment.
  • B002 — Behaviour: Demonstrates clear and respectful communication by adapting language, tone, and message structure to stakeholders and context.

Indicative Content

ti2119 — Interpret individual and team behaviour in contribution contexts

  • LO064 — Individual Behaviour: Perception, attitudes, motivation, engagement, personality, emotional awareness, work expectations, role clarity, and behaviour in contribution contexts.
  • LO065 — Team Dynamics: Group formation, roles, norms, trust, communication patterns, decision-making, cooperation, shared responsibility, and team effectiveness.
  • LO066 — Organizational Culture: Values, norms, informal practices, belonging, psychological safety, organizational identity, climate, and culture-shaping behaviours.

ti7221 — Support motivation, cooperation, and team performance

  • LO067 — Motivation and Performance: Motivation theories, recognition, feedback, goal setting, performance conditions, autonomy, belonging, fairness, and contribution support.
  • LO068 — Inclusion and Participation: Inclusive practices, participation barriers, equity of voice, cultural sensitivity, accessibility, and shared responsibility.
  • LO069 — Leadership Support: Influence, role modelling, facilitation, team support, accountability, ethical conduct, and contribution to group functioning.

ti7398 — Communicate and coordinate through conflict or group issues

  • LO070 — Communication and Relationships: Respectful communication, listening, feedback, interpersonal dynamics, conflict prevention, role-sensitive communication, and stakeholder relationships.
  • LO071 — Conflict and Cooperation: Sources of conflict, constructive disagreement, issue clarification, mediation pathways, escalation, collaboration, and shared problem-solving.
  • LO072 — Contextual Application: Workplace or civic/community settings where people, teams, volunteers, committees, stakeholders, or contributors must coordinate, communicate, cooperate, resolve issues, or improve group functioning.

Artifact Element 1

AE006 — Journal or Logbook Entries

Evidentiary purpose: Captures a structured organizational behaviour practice log showing repeated observation, reflection, contribution, and adjustment across people, team, culture, cooperation, communication, motivation, conflict, or performance contexts. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence organizational behaviour understanding, issue identification, systems awareness, professional judgment, respectful communication, and constructive collaboration through a sequence of situated entries.

Minimum characteristics: - Identifies the workplace or civic/community setting, the time period covered, the contributor role, the group/team/stakeholder context, and the purpose of the log. - Includes at least three dated entries or clearly separated situational entries. Each entry identifies the relevant meeting, interaction, event, contribution episode, task, group issue, or team context. - Records individual, team, role, culture, motivation, communication, cooperation, conflict, participation, or performance factors observed in each entry. - Identifies what the entry is based on, such as direct observation, meeting participation, stakeholder interaction, feedback, task coordination, communication exchange, performance information, or contribution activity. - Explains how the observed factors affected coordination, cooperation, performance, culture, motivation, communication, shared responsibility, or group functioning. - Describes what the contributor did, communicated, clarified, supported, coordinated, adjusted, escalated, or followed up on in response to the observed condition. - Summarizes what changed, what was clarified, what was learned, what was adjusted, what improved, what remained unresolved, or what follow-up became necessary. - Demonstrates that the entries remain respectful, role-appropriate, non-diagnostic, non-clinical, non-therapeutic, and bounded within management contribution. - Summarizes the pattern or development across entries, including recurring people/team factors, communication adjustments, cooperation improvements, system relationships, or shared responsibility insights. - Describes the contributor’s role in observing, participating, communicating, supporting, coordinating, documenting, reflecting, or following up.

Workplace example

A workplace organizational behaviour log, team interaction journal, role clarity log, culture observation log, meeting reflection log, motivation and cooperation log, conflict reflection log, stakeholder interaction log, or people-practice contribution log. The artifact must include multiple dated entries showing observation, interpretation, contribution, reflection, and follow-up across people, team, communication, culture, cooperation, or performance conditions.

Civic/community example

A civic/community organizational behaviour log, volunteer interaction journal, committee participation log, event team reflection log, culture observation log, stakeholder interaction log, conflict reflection log, or people-practice contribution log. The artifact must include multiple dated entries showing observation, interpretation, contribution, reflection, and follow-up across people, team, communication, culture, cooperation, or performance conditions.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Follow — Develops the artifact using an established approach with regular direction and review.
  • Complexity: Follow — Works with familiar information and a defined situation; direct reproduction without situated interpretation is insufficient.
  • Contribution scope: Follow — Produces an output that is used within an assigned task or immediate contribution activity.

Insufficient evidence conditions

  • required characteristics absent
  • role cannot be attributed
  • no credible situated use
  • required validation missing

Assessment Components

AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration

Redo (R): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is missing when yes or does not credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is present when yes, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a structured organizational behaviour practice log showing repeated observation, reflection, contribution, and adjustment across people, team, culture, cooperation, communication, motivation, conflict, or performance contexts. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence organizational behaviour understanding, issue identification, systems awareness, professional judgment, respectful communication, and constructive collaboration through a sequence of situated entries.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation

Redo (R): Host Organization Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the log relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in observing, participating, supporting, coordinating, communicating, or following up within that context.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Host Organization Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the log relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in observing, participating, supporting, coordinating, communicating, or following up within that context.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a structured organizational behaviour practice log showing repeated observation, reflection, contribution, and adjustment across people, team, culture, cooperation, communication, motivation, conflict, or performance contexts. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence organizational behaviour understanding, issue identification, systems awareness, professional judgment, respectful communication, and constructive collaboration through a sequence of situated entries.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC007 — Peer / Team Corroboration

Redo (R): Peer / Team Corroboration is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms contribution in collaborative people, team, culture, conflict, or performance contexts where the log references shared activity, group interaction, team processes, or stakeholder participation.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Peer / Team Corroboration is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms contribution in collaborative people, team, culture, conflict, or performance contexts where the log references shared activity, group interaction, team processes, or stakeholder participation.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a structured organizational behaviour practice log showing repeated observation, reflection, contribution, and adjustment across people, team, culture, cooperation, communication, motivation, conflict, or performance contexts. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence organizational behaviour understanding, issue identification, systems awareness, professional judgment, respectful communication, and constructive collaboration through a sequence of situated entries.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

Artifact Element 2

AE003 — Project Documentation

Evidentiary purpose: Captures structured people, team, cooperation, conflict, or performance support documentation showing how role expectations, communication, stakeholders, tasks, options, and next steps are coordinated. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence people management support, stakeholder communication, negotiation/alignment logic, coordination, and constructive collaboration.

Minimum characteristics: - Identifies the team, people, role, motivation, cooperation, conflict, participation, performance, or stakeholder alignment issue being addressed. - States the desired outcome, such as role clarity, cooperation, participation, shared responsibility, issue resolution, performance support, or stakeholder alignment. - Identifies the people, teams, role holders, stakeholder groups, contributors, volunteers, committees, or responsible parties involved. - Identifies stakeholder interests, concerns, constraints, role expectations, communication needs, participation barriers, performance needs, or cooperation requirements. - Provides a structured sequence of actions, options, support steps, communication steps, coordination actions, or issue response steps. - Describes how communication, tone, participation, inclusion, cooperation, feedback, or shared responsibility will be supported. - Identifies sequence, timing, priority, status, milestone, dependency, progress point, follow-up timing, or completion indicator. - Identifies how progress, cooperation, issue resolution, alignment, participation, performance support, or unresolved concerns will be monitored, followed up, or escalated. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, coordinating, communicating, documenting, monitoring, supporting, or using the people/team coordination documentation.

Workplace example

A workplace team action plan, role clarification tracker, cooperation improvement plan, conflict response tracker, meeting action register, participation plan, feedback tracker, stakeholder alignment plan, or team performance support document showing how people, roles, communication, tasks, and next steps are coordinated.

Civic/community example

A civic/community team action plan, volunteer coordination tracker, role clarification tracker, committee cooperation plan, conflict response tracker, event team action register, participation plan, stakeholder alignment plan, or group performance support document showing how people, roles, communication, tasks, and next steps are coordinated.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Apply — Frames and develops the artifact independently within agreed authority, seeking direction for material exceptions.
  • Complexity: Apply — Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output.
  • Contribution scope: Assist — Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Insufficient evidence conditions

  • required characteristics absent
  • role cannot be attributed
  • no credible situated use
  • required validation missing

Assessment Components

AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration

Redo (R): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is missing when yes or does not credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is present when yes, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured people, team, cooperation, conflict, or performance support documentation showing how role expectations, communication, stakeholders, tasks, options, and next steps are coordinated. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence people management support, stakeholder communication, negotiation/alignment logic, coordination, and constructive collaboration.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation

Redo (R): Host Organization Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, coordinating, communicating, monitoring, or using the artifact.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Host Organization Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, coordinating, communicating, monitoring, or using the artifact.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured people, team, cooperation, conflict, or performance support documentation showing how role expectations, communication, stakeholders, tasks, options, and next steps are coordinated. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence people management support, stakeholder communication, negotiation/alignment logic, coordination, and constructive collaboration.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC007 — Peer / Team Corroboration

Redo (R): Peer / Team Corroboration is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirms contribution in collaborative people, team, culture, conflict, or performance contexts where the artifact was produced by, informed by, or used within a team, committee, stakeholder group, or coordinated activity.; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Peer / Team Corroboration is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms contribution in collaborative people, team, culture, conflict, or performance contexts where the artifact was produced by, informed by, or used within a team, committee, stakeholder group, or coordinated activity.; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured people, team, cooperation, conflict, or performance support documentation showing how role expectations, communication, stakeholders, tasks, options, and next steps are coordinated. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence people management support, stakeholder communication, negotiation/alignment logic, coordination, and constructive collaboration.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

Completion and result

  • Each Artifact Element is assessed through its own reposited Assessment Components.
  • Each required Assessment Component must achieve at least Pass (P) for its Artifact Element.
  • Both Artifact Elements must achieve Pass (P) or Distinction (D) to complete the Training Unit.
  • Any Redo (R) returns the Training Unit for revision.
  • Distinction is available only when the LMO reposits D criteria and both Artifact Elements achieve D. D is not assumed or inferred.
  • Formal Assessment Methods are not used at TI or TU level; they are reserved for EPA/EA.

Your submission must include

  1. Artifact Element 1 — the artifact file and a short explanation of its context, your role, and how it was used.
  2. Artifact Element 2 — the artifact file and a short explanation of its context, your role, and how it was used.
  3. Contribution context — select pre-service or in-practice.
  4. Organization evaluator details — required for an in-practice submission.
  5. Artifact Authenticity Declaration (AC005) — required.

Both artifacts must arise naturally from workplace or civic/community contribution. Each artifact is assessed directly against its own Redo (R), Pass (P), and optional Distinction (D) criteria. Both must achieve P or D. If either receives R, the application is returned for revision and resubmission.

This TU application does not require a STARR Reflection or Contribution Witness Statement as separately graded Assessment Components.

Please use the format: X0X 0X0 (ANA NAN)
### Artifact Element 1 — AE006 — Journal or Logbook Entries #### Evidentiary purpose Captures a structured organizational behaviour practice log showing repeated observation, reflection, contribution, and adjustment across people, team, culture, cooperation, communication, motivation, conflict, or performance contexts. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence organizational behaviour understanding, issue identification, systems awareness, professional judgment, respectful communication, and constructive collaboration through a sequence of situated entries. #### Minimum characteristics - Identifies the workplace or civic/community setting, the time period covered, the contributor role, the group/team/stakeholder context, and the purpose of the log. - Includes at least three dated entries or clearly separated situational entries. Each entry identifies the relevant meeting, interaction, event, contribution episode, task, group issue, or team context. - Records individual, team, role, culture, motivation, communication, cooperation, conflict, participation, or performance factors observed in each entry. - Identifies what the entry is based on, such as direct observation, meeting participation, stakeholder interaction, feedback, task coordination, communication exchange, performance information, or contribution activity. - Explains how the observed factors affected coordination, cooperation, performance, culture, motivation, communication, shared responsibility, or group functioning. - Describes what the contributor did, communicated, clarified, supported, coordinated, adjusted, escalated, or followed up on in response to the observed condition. - Summarizes what changed, what was clarified, what was learned, what was adjusted, what improved, what remained unresolved, or what follow-up became necessary. - Demonstrates that the entries remain respectful, role-appropriate, non-diagnostic, non-clinical, non-therapeutic, and bounded within management contribution. - Summarizes the pattern or development across entries, including recurring people/team factors, communication adjustments, cooperation improvements, system relationships, or shared responsibility insights. - Describes the contributor’s role in observing, participating, communicating, supporting, coordinating, documenting, reflecting, or following up. #### Acceptable examples - **Workplace:** A workplace organizational behaviour log, team interaction journal, role clarity log, culture observation log, meeting reflection log, motivation and cooperation log, conflict reflection log, stakeholder interaction log, or people-practice contribution log. The artifact must include multiple dated entries showing observation, interpretation, contribution, reflection, and follow-up across people, team, communication, culture, cooperation, or performance conditions. - **Civic/community:** A civic/community organizational behaviour log, volunteer interaction journal, committee participation log, event team reflection log, culture observation log, stakeholder interaction log, conflict reflection log, or people-practice contribution log. The artifact must include multiple dated entries showing observation, interpretation, contribution, reflection, and follow-up across people, team, communication, culture, cooperation, or performance conditions. #### Required Experience Context - **Autonomy 1 — Follow:** Develops the artifact using an established approach with regular direction and review. - **Complexity 1 — Follow:** Works with familiar information and a defined situation; direct reproduction without situated interpretation is insufficient. - **Contribution scope 1 — Follow:** Produces an output that is used within an assigned task or immediate contribution activity.
### Artifact Element 1 — AE006 — Journal or Logbook Entries — Assessment #### Assessment criteria - **Redo (R):** R — The Artifact Element is incomplete, cannot be reliably attributed to the contributor, lacks credible situated use, omits one or more minimum characteristics, falls below a required Experience Context condition, or does not provide substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a structured organizational behaviour practice log showing repeated observation, reflection, contribution, and adjustment across people, team, culture, cooperation, communication, motivation, conflict, or performance contexts. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence organizational behaviour understanding, issue identification, systems awareness, professional judgment, respectful communication, and constructive collaboration through a sequence of situated entries. - **Pass (P):** P — The Artifact Element is attributable to the contributor, arose through a credible workplace or civic/community contribution, meets all minimum characteristics and required Experience Context conditions, and provides substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a structured organizational behaviour practice log showing repeated observation, reflection, contribution, and adjustment across people, team, culture, cooperation, communication, motivation, conflict, or performance contexts. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence organizational behaviour understanding, issue identification, systems awareness, professional judgment, respectful communication, and constructive collaboration through a sequence of situated entries. - **Distinction (D, optional):** Not reposited. Distinction is unavailable for this Artifact Element. #### Attestations - **AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration** — Required - **AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC007 — Contribution Use or Impact Confirmation** — Conditional #### Insufficient evidence includes - required characteristics absent - role cannot be attributed - no credible situated use - required validation missing
Upload Artifact Element 1 — AE006 — Journal or Logbook Entries
Describe the setting, your role, the purpose of the artifact, how it was used, and the people or decision it supported.
### Artifact Element 2 — AE003 — Project Documentation #### Evidentiary purpose Captures structured people, team, cooperation, conflict, or performance support documentation showing how role expectations, communication, stakeholders, tasks, options, and next steps are coordinated. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence people management support, stakeholder communication, negotiation/alignment logic, coordination, and constructive collaboration. #### Minimum characteristics - Identifies the team, people, role, motivation, cooperation, conflict, participation, performance, or stakeholder alignment issue being addressed. - States the desired outcome, such as role clarity, cooperation, participation, shared responsibility, issue resolution, performance support, or stakeholder alignment. - Identifies the people, teams, role holders, stakeholder groups, contributors, volunteers, committees, or responsible parties involved. - Identifies stakeholder interests, concerns, constraints, role expectations, communication needs, participation barriers, performance needs, or cooperation requirements. - Provides a structured sequence of actions, options, support steps, communication steps, coordination actions, or issue response steps. - Describes how communication, tone, participation, inclusion, cooperation, feedback, or shared responsibility will be supported. - Identifies sequence, timing, priority, status, milestone, dependency, progress point, follow-up timing, or completion indicator. - Identifies how progress, cooperation, issue resolution, alignment, participation, performance support, or unresolved concerns will be monitored, followed up, or escalated. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, coordinating, communicating, documenting, monitoring, supporting, or using the people/team coordination documentation. #### Acceptable examples - **Workplace:** A workplace team action plan, role clarification tracker, cooperation improvement plan, conflict response tracker, meeting action register, participation plan, feedback tracker, stakeholder alignment plan, or team performance support document showing how people, roles, communication, tasks, and next steps are coordinated. - **Civic/community:** A civic/community team action plan, volunteer coordination tracker, role clarification tracker, committee cooperation plan, conflict response tracker, event team action register, participation plan, stakeholder alignment plan, or group performance support document showing how people, roles, communication, tasks, and next steps are coordinated. #### Required Experience Context - **Autonomy 3 — Apply:** Frames and develops the artifact independently within agreed authority, seeking direction for material exceptions. - **Complexity 3 — Apply:** Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output. - **Contribution scope 2 — Assist:** Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.
### Artifact Element 2 — AE003 — Project Documentation — Assessment #### Assessment criteria - **Redo (R):** R — The Artifact Element is incomplete, cannot be reliably attributed to the contributor, lacks credible situated use, omits one or more minimum characteristics, falls below a required Experience Context condition, or does not provide substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures structured people, team, cooperation, conflict, or performance support documentation showing how role expectations, communication, stakeholders, tasks, options, and next steps are coordinated. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence people management support, stakeholder communication, negotiation/alignment logic, coordination, and constructive collaboration. - **Pass (P):** P — The Artifact Element is attributable to the contributor, arose through a credible workplace or civic/community contribution, meets all minimum characteristics and required Experience Context conditions, and provides substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures structured people, team, cooperation, conflict, or performance support documentation showing how role expectations, communication, stakeholders, tasks, options, and next steps are coordinated. this Artifact Element record is designed to evidence people management support, stakeholder communication, negotiation/alignment logic, coordination, and constructive collaboration. - **Distinction (D, optional):** Not reposited. Distinction is unavailable for this Artifact Element. #### Attestations - **AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration** — Required - **AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC007 — Contribution Use or Impact Confirmation** — Conditional #### Insufficient evidence includes - required characteristics absent - role cannot be attributed - no credible situated use - required validation missing
Upload Artifact Element 2 — AE003 — Project Documentation
Describe the setting, your role, the purpose of the artifact, how it was used, and the people or decision it supported.
Full name of the authorized organization evaluator
Work email address of the authorized organization evaluator
Role, organization, and relationship to the contributor
### Completion decision - **Redo (R):** Any R on either Artifact Element returns the Training Unit for redo. - **Pass (P):** Both Artifact Elements achieve P or D and all required attestations are complete. - **Distinction (D):** Both Artifact Elements achieve D against approved LMO-reposited D criteria. AC003–AC007 are attestations. They confirm authenticity, context, domain, source, or use as applicable; they are not graded and do not own R, P, or D criteria. No formal Assessment Method is attached at TI or TU level.
- or -

Powered by

CanCred Factory logo