Support Practices of Managerial Economics (tu0152)

Support Practices of Managerial Economics (tu0152)

logo

Contribution Exchange

info@contributionexchange.org

Making contribution visible, trusted, and portable.

Contribution Exchange is an international organization headquartered in Ottawa, Canada, building shared infrastructure for recognizing learning and capability developed through contribution.

Through an international federation of National Contribution Exchanges, Contribution Exchange stewards common standards for work-based learning, professional practice, recognition, and quality assurance. Its systems help organizations structure, validate, and recognize learning developed through work, community, civic, cultural, and other purposeful contributions.

Contribution Exchange also stewards the Work-Based Learning Numbering System (WBLNS®) and PathLedger®, providing interoperable infrastructure to index learning standards, record verified contributions, and make trusted evidence of capability portable across organizations, sectors, and borders.

Tags:

CIM, contribution, economics, learning, management, managerial, training, unit, work-based
This Training Unit develops managerial economics contribution across external market conditions, economic indicators, demand and supply factors, pricing and resource implications, cost and constraint awareness, policy conditions, and evidence-informed management decisions. Participants demonstrate the ability to interpret economic and market information, identify implications for management action, and support decisions through structured analysis and practical planning documentation.

Criteria

Contribution recognized

Support management decisions by interpreting economic conditions, market factors, and resource implications.

Training Unit structure

This Training Unit aggregates exactly three child Training Items:

  1. ti9395 — Interpret economic and market conditions (73.3.CA6532/ti9395D)
  2. ti7204 — Analyze cost, demand, and resource implications (73.3.CA6532/ti7204D)
  3. ti9079 — Support management decisions using economic reasoning (73.3.CA6532/ti9079D)

Completion requires two naturally occurring Artifact Elements that together provide substantial evidence across the three child Training Items.

Aggregated Learning Goals

  • LG031 — Learners will develop their ability to interpret economic and market conditions to contribute to management decisions in changing environments.
  • LG032 — Learners will develop their ability to analyze cost, demand, and resource implications to support management decisions.
  • LG033 — Learners will develop their ability to use economic reasoning to contribute to evidence-informed management decisions.

Aggregated Learning Outcomes

  1. LO091 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify economic indicators, market conditions, or external factors relevant to a management decision.
  2. LO092 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to describe how economic or market conditions affect organizational or civic/community activity.
  3. LO093 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to summarize implications of economic or market conditions for planning, operations, stakeholders, or resource decisions.
  4. LO094 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify cost, demand, pricing, resource, or constraint factors relevant to a management scenario.
  5. LO095 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to compare economic trade-offs, constraints, or implications affecting a decision.
  6. LO096 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to summarize financial, operational, stakeholder, or resource implications for decision support.
  7. LO097 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to identify a management decision that requires economic or market reasoning.
  8. LO098 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to build a supported economic argument using evidence, assumptions, and stakeholder context.
  9. LO099 — Upon completion, the learner will be able to present a supported management conclusion, option, or recommendation using economic reasoning.

Aggregated Knowledge, Skills, and Behaviours

  • K003 — Knowledge: Understands management information and evidence systems in order to contribute to informed planning, monitoring, and decision-making.
  • K011 — Knowledge: Understands economic concepts and external market conditions in order to contribute to management decisions in changing environments.
  • S005 — Skill: Interprets management information using relevant evidence, records, data, and context to support planning, monitoring, and decisions.
  • S011 — Skill: Applies economic and market analysis using external conditions, indicators, and policy factors to support management decisions.
  • B005 — Behaviour: Demonstrates responsiveness to wider implications by considering legal, social, economic, financial, human, and operational consequences.
  • K004 — Knowledge: Understands financial management concepts in order to contribute to planning, analysis, and resource decisions.
  • B004 — Behaviour: Demonstrates evidence-informed decision-making by using relevant information, analysis, and context when contributing to decisions.
  • S003 — Skill: Builds supported arguments using claims, evidence, reasoning, and stakeholder context to influence decisions and coordinated action.

Indicative Content

ti9395 — Interpret economic and market conditions

  • LO091 — Economic Conditions: Inflation, interest rates, labour market conditions, supply constraints, demand shifts, exchange rates, public policy conditions, taxation effects, and general economic climate.
  • LO092 — Market Structures and Competition: Competitive conditions, substitutes, alternatives, market positioning, barriers, pricing pressure, sector conditions, and service comparisons.
  • LO093 — Forecasting and Scenario Awareness: Demand estimates, scenario assumptions, external conditions, uncertainty, risk, planning horizons, and implication mapping.

ti7204 — Analyze cost, demand, and resource implications

  • LO094 — Demand and Supply: Customer or stakeholder demand, supply availability, scarcity, market signals, price sensitivity, service demand, participation demand, and capacity constraints.
  • LO095 — Cost and Resource Implications: Fixed and variable costs, opportunity cost, marginal thinking, resource allocation, affordability, capacity, trade-offs, and constraint management.
  • LO096 — Pricing and Value Decisions: Pricing logic, cost recovery, value perception, willingness to pay, fee setting, discounting, funding implications, and stakeholder fairness.

ti9079 — Support management decisions using economic reasoning

  • LO097 — Policy and External Factors: Government policy, regulation, incentives, funding conditions, procurement rules, trade conditions, community needs, and public-interest considerations.
  • LO098 — Evidence-Informed Economic Judgment: Use of economic data, market information, stakeholder input, cost information, trend evidence, assumptions, and contextual interpretation.
  • LO099 — Contextual Application: Workplace or civic/community settings where economic or market factors affect pricing, resource planning, service delivery, funding, stakeholder response, operations, or management decisions.

Artifact Element 1

AE003 — Project Documentation

Evidentiary purpose: Captures structured economic, market, cost, demand, resource, scenario, or policy analysis documentation that organizes external conditions, assumptions, comparisons, constraints, and decision implications. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic and market analysis, interpretation of management information, resource implication analysis, evidence-informed decision support, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Minimum characteristics: - Identifies the decision, planning question, pricing question, resource issue, demand issue, policy issue, capacity issue, or economic concern being addressed. - Identifies the economic indicators, market conditions, demand factors, supply constraints, pricing conditions, labour conditions, policy factors, inflationary pressures, or external conditions considered. - Identifies the data, records, reports, observations, stakeholder input, financial information, market information, policy information, cost records, or assumptions used. - Identifies key assumptions, constraints, uncertainty, data limits, time horizon, resource limits, policy constraints, market constraints, or interpretation limits. - Presents a structured comparison, scenario, demand estimate, resource analysis, cost implication, policy impact, market condition comparison, or trade-off analysis. - Explains what the economic or market information suggests for planning, pricing, operations, resources, stakeholders, risk, affordability, or decision-making. - Identifies the supported option, planning implication, decision implication, response pathway, risk consideration, monitoring need, or follow-up question. - Describes the participant’s role in gathering, organizing, comparing, interpreting, documenting, communicating, or using the economic analysis documentation.

Workplace example

A workplace economic analysis worksheet, market condition tracker, cost-demand comparison, pricing scenario worksheet, resource allocation model, policy impact tracker, demand forecast worksheet, service capacity comparison, or decision-support analysis document. The artifact must show the management question, external or economic factors considered, source information, assumptions, comparison or scenario logic, and decision implications.

Civic/community example

A civic/community economic analysis worksheet, funding environment tracker, service demand comparison, fee or affordability scenario worksheet, resource allocation model, policy impact tracker, participation demand worksheet, community capacity comparison, or governance decision-support analysis document. The artifact must show the management or governance question, external or economic factors considered, source information, assumptions, comparison or scenario logic, and decision implications.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Apply — Frames and develops the artifact independently within agreed authority, seeking direction for material exceptions.
  • Complexity: Apply — Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output.
  • Contribution scope: Assist — Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Insufficient evidence conditions

  • required characteristics absent
  • role cannot be attributed
  • no credible situated use
  • required validation missing

Assessment Components

AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration

Redo (R): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is missing when yes, or does not credibly confirm that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is present when yes, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit; together with the Artifact Element it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured economic, market, cost, demand, resource, scenario, or policy analysis documentation that organizes external conditions, assumptions, comparisons, constraints, and decision implications. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic and market analysis, interpretation of management information, resource implication analysis, evidence-informed decision support, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation

Redo (R): Source Data / Record Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirm that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, reports, market information, policy information, financial information, stakeholder input, or source inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Source Data / Record Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, reports, market information, policy information, financial information, stakeholder input, or source inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated. Together with the Artifact Element, it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured economic, market, cost, demand, resource, scenario, or policy analysis documentation that organizes external conditions, assumptions, comparisons, constraints, and decision implications. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic and market analysis, interpretation of management information, resource implication analysis, evidence-informed decision support, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC004 — Domain Validator Statement

Redo (R): Domain Validator Statement is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirm that the artifact is technically plausible and appropriately bounded within the economic, market, financial, pricing, policy, funding, resource, or operations domain where domain-specific interpretation is involved; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Domain Validator Statement is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact is technically plausible and appropriately bounded within the economic, market, financial, pricing, policy, funding, resource, or operations domain where domain-specific interpretation is involved. Together with the Artifact Element, it supports the reposited purpose: Captures structured economic, market, cost, demand, resource, scenario, or policy analysis documentation that organizes external conditions, assumptions, comparisons, constraints, and decision implications. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic and market analysis, interpretation of management information, resource implication analysis, evidence-informed decision support, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

Artifact Element 2

AE001 — Management and Technical Reports

Evidentiary purpose: Captures a management economics briefing or decision-support report that interprets economic or market information, explains implications, builds a supported argument, and presents a management conclusion, option, or recommendation. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic reasoning, supported argument, evidence-informed decision-making, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Minimum characteristics: - Identifies the management or civic/community decision being supported and the purpose of the report. - Describes the economic condition, market condition, demand/supply issue, pricing issue, resource constraint, policy factor, or external factor relevant to the decision. - Identifies the records, market information, economic indicators, financial information, stakeholder input, policy information, cost information, assumptions, or other evidence reviewed. - Explains what the economic or market information means for the decision, including relevant assumptions, trends, comparisons, constraints, risks, opportunities, or interpretation limits. - Explains relevant economic, financial, operational, social, legal, policy, human, stakeholder, community, or resource implications. - Identifies possible options, alternatives, trade-offs, constraints, risks, affordability considerations, pricing/resource consequences, or decision pathways. - States the recommended action, supported conclusion, planning implication, decision-support position, option, or management consideration. - Describes the participant’s role in preparing, interpreting, reviewing, communicating, recommending, or using the economic briefing or report.

Workplace example

A workplace economic briefing, market implications report, pricing recommendation, policy impact memo, demand response note, resource decision report, scenario recommendation, or management decision memo. The artifact must interpret economic or market information and present implications for a workplace management, pricing, resource, service, operational, or stakeholder decision.

Civic/community example

A civic/community economic briefing, funding environment report, service demand recommendation, fee or affordability memo, policy impact note, community response report, resource decision memo, scenario recommendation, or governance decision report. The artifact must interpret economic or market information and present implications for a civic/community governance, funding, service, resource, stakeholder, or policy decision.

Experience Context

  • Autonomy: Apply — Frames and develops the artifact independently within agreed authority, seeking direction for material exceptions.
  • Complexity: Apply — Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output.
  • Contribution scope: Assist — Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.

Insufficient evidence conditions

  • required characteristics absent
  • role cannot be attributed
  • no credible situated use
  • required validation missing

Assessment Components

AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration

Redo (R): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is missing when yes, or does not credibly confirm that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Artifact Authenticity Declaration is present when yes, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the participant produced or materially contributed to the artifact submitted for the Training Unit; together with the Artifact Element, it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a management economics briefing or decision-support report that interprets economic or market information, explains implications, builds a supported argument, and presents a management conclusion, option, or recommendation. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic reasoning, supported argument, evidence-informed decision-making, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation

Redo (R): Host Organization Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirm that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, interpreting, recommending, communicating, or using the artifact; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Host Organization Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact relates to a genuine contribution context and that the participant had a legitimate role in producing, supporting, interpreting, recommending, communicating, or using the artifact. Together with the Artifact Element, it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a management economics briefing or decision-support report that interprets economic or market information, explains implications, builds a supported argument, and presents a management conclusion, option, or recommendation. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic reasoning, supported argument, evidence-informed decision-making, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation

Redo (R): Source Data / Record Confirmation is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirm that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, reports, market information, policy information, financial information, stakeholder input, or source inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Source Data / Record Confirmation is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact draws from appropriate records, data, reports, market information, policy information, financial information, stakeholder input, or source inputs where such inputs are not public or self-generated. Together with the Artifact Element, it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a management economics briefing or decision-support report that interprets economic or market information, explains implications, builds a supported argument, and presents a management conclusion, option, or recommendation. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic reasoning, supported argument, evidence-informed decision-making, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

AC004 — Domain Validator Statement

Redo (R): Domain Validator Statement is missing when conditional or does not credibly confirm that the artifact is technically plausible and appropriately bounded within the economic, market, financial, pricing, policy, funding, resource, or operations domain where domain-specific interpretation is involved; the Artifact Element therefore does not yet provide sufficient, attributable evidence of the reposited purpose.

Pass (P): Domain Validator Statement is present when conditional, attributable to an eligible validator, and credibly confirms that the artifact is technically plausible and appropriately bounded within the economic, market, financial, pricing, policy, funding, resource, or operations domain where domain-specific interpretation is involved. Together with the Artifact Element, it supports the reposited purpose: Captures a management economics briefing or decision-support report that interprets economic or market information, explains implications, builds a supported argument, and presents a management conclusion, option, or recommendation. This Artifact Element record is designed to evidence economic reasoning, supported argument, evidence-informed decision-making, and responsiveness to wider implications.

Distinction (D): Not reposited — optional LMO decision. Distinction is unavailable for this component unless the LMO authors and approves a D criterion.

Completion and result

  • Each Artifact Element is assessed through its own reposited Assessment Components.
  • Each required Assessment Component must achieve at least Pass (P) for its Artifact Element.
  • Both Artifact Elements must achieve Pass (P) or Distinction (D) to complete the Training Unit.
  • Any Redo (R) returns the Training Unit for revision.
  • Distinction is available only when the LMO reposits D criteria, and both Artifact Elements achieve D. D is not assumed or inferred.
  • Formal Assessment Methods are not used at TI or TU level; they are reserved for EPA/EA.

Your submission must include

  1. Artifact Element 1 — the artifact file and a short explanation of its context, your role, and how it was used.
  2. Artifact Element 2 — the artifact file and a short explanation of its context, your role, and how it was used.
  3. Contribution context — select pre-service or in-practice.
  4. Organization evaluator details — required for an in-practice submission.
  5. Artifact Authenticity Declaration (AC005) — required.

Both artifacts must arise naturally from workplace or civic/community contribution. Each artifact is assessed directly against its own Redo (R), Pass (P), and optional Distinction (D) criteria. Both must achieve P or D. If either receives R, the application is returned for revision and resubmission.

This TU application does not require a STARR Reflection or Contribution Witness Statement as separately graded Assessment Components.

Please use the format: X0X 0X0 (ANA NAN)
### Artifact Element 1 — AE003 — Project Documentation #### Evidentiary purpose Captures structured economic, market, cost, demand, resource, scenario, or policy analysis documentation that organizes external conditions, assumptions, comparisons, constraints, and decision implications. #### Minimum characteristics - Management or Governance Question - Economic or Market Factors Considered - Source Information and Evidence Used - Assumptions, Constraints, and Limits - Cost, Demand, Resource, Policy, or Scenario Comparison - Interpretation of Economic Implications - Decision-Support Implication or Option - Contributor Role #### Acceptable examples - **Workplace:** A workplace economic analysis worksheet, market condition tracker, cost-demand comparison, pricing scenario worksheet, resource allocation model, policy impact tracker, demand forecast worksheet, service capacity comparison, or decision-support analysis document. The artifact must show the management question, external or economic factors considered, source information, assumptions, comparison or scenario logic, and decision implications. - **Civic/community:** A civic/community economic analysis worksheet, funding environment tracker, service demand comparison, fee or affordability scenario worksheet, resource allocation model, policy impact tracker, participation demand worksheet, community capacity comparison, or governance decision-support analysis document. The artifact must show the management or governance question, external or economic factors considered, source information, assumptions, comparison or scenario logic, and decision implications. #### Required Experience Context - **Autonomy 2 — Assist:** Develops the artifact within established parameters, coordinating with an appropriate supervisor, lead, client, or community authority as needed. - **Complexity 3 — Apply:** Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output. - **Contribution scope 2 — Assist:** Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.
### Artifact Element 1 — AE003 — Project Documentation — Assessment #### Assessment criteria - **Redo (R):** R — The Artifact Element is incomplete, cannot be reliably attributed to the contributor, lacks credible situated use, omits one or more minimum characteristics, falls below a required Experience Context condition, or does not provide substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures structured economic, market, cost, demand, resource, scenario, or policy analysis documentation that organizes external conditions, assumptions, comparisons, constraints, and decision implications. - **Pass (P):** P — The Artifact Element is attributable to the contributor, arose through a credible workplace or civic/community contribution, meets all minimum characteristics and required Experience Context conditions, and provides substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures structured economic, market, cost, demand, resource, scenario, or policy analysis documentation that organizes external conditions, assumptions, comparisons, constraints, and decision implications. - **Distinction (D, optional):** Where reposited by the LMO, the artifact exceeds the Pass standard through exceptional integration of economic, market, cost, demand, resource, policy, or scenario evidence; unusually clear and defensible reasoning; and usefulness beyond routine decision support. Distinction evaluates evidence quality and does not change the required experience-context level. #### Attestations - **AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration** — Required - **AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC004 — Domain Validator Statement** — Conditional #### Insufficient evidence includes - one or more minimum characteristics is absent - the contributor’s role cannot be attributed - there is no credible situated use - a required Experience Context condition is not met - a required attestation is missing
Upload Artifact Element 1 — AE003 — Project Documentation
Describe the setting, your role, the purpose of the artifact, how it was used, and the people or decision it supported.
### Artifact Element 2 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports #### Evidentiary purpose Captures a management economics briefing or decision-support report that interprets economic or market information, explains implications, builds a supported argument, and presents a management conclusion, option, or recommendation. #### Minimum characteristics - Decision Context and Purpose - Economic or Market Context - Evidence and Source Information Reviewed - Interpretation or Analysis - Wider Implications - Options, Alternatives, or Trade-Offs - Supported Conclusion or Recommendation - Contributor Role #### Acceptable examples - **Workplace:** A workplace economic briefing, market implications report, pricing recommendation, policy impact memo, demand response note, resource decision report, scenario recommendation, or management decision memo. The artifact must interpret economic or market information and present implications for a workplace management, pricing, resource, service, operational, or stakeholder decision. - **Civic/community:** A civic/community economic briefing, funding environment report, service demand recommendation, fee or affordability memo, policy impact note, community response report, resource decision memo, scenario recommendation, or governance decision report. The artifact must interpret economic or market information and present implications for a civic/community governance, funding, service, resource, stakeholder, or policy decision. #### Required Experience Context - **Autonomy 2 — Assist:** Develops the artifact within established parameters, coordinating with an appropriate supervisor, lead, client, or community authority as needed. - **Complexity 3 — Apply:** Integrates ambiguous or competing information, constraints, and implications to produce a defensible output. - **Contribution scope 2 — Assist:** Produces a usable output that supports another person’s planning, coordination, decision, or action.
### Artifact Element 2 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports — Assessment #### Assessment criteria - **Redo (R):** R — The Artifact Element is incomplete, cannot be reliably attributed to the contributor, lacks credible situated use, omits one or more minimum characteristics, falls below a required Experience Context condition, or does not provide substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a management economics briefing or decision-support report that interprets economic or market information, explains implications, builds a supported argument, and presents a management conclusion, option, or recommendation. - **Pass (P):** P — The Artifact Element is attributable to the contributor, arose through a credible workplace or civic/community contribution, meets all minimum characteristics and required Experience Context conditions, and provides substantial evidence of its reposited purpose: Captures a management economics briefing or decision-support report that interprets economic or market information, explains implications, builds a supported argument, and presents a management conclusion, option, or recommendation. - **Distinction (D, optional):** Where reposited by the LMO, the artifact exceeds the Pass standard through exceptional synthesis of economic or market evidence, implications, trade-offs, and supported judgement; unusually strong contextual usefulness; and a compelling, defensible conclusion or recommendation. Distinction evaluates evidence quality and does not change the required experience-context level. #### Attestations - **AC005 — Artifact Authenticity Declaration** — Required - **AC003 — Host Organization Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC006 — Source Data / Record Confirmation** — Conditional - **AC004 — Domain Validator Statement** — Conditional #### Insufficient evidence includes - one or more minimum characteristics is absent - the contributor’s role cannot be attributed - there is no credible situated use - a required Experience Context condition is not met - a required attestation is missing
Upload Artifact Element 2 — AE001 — Management and Technical Reports
Describe the setting, your role, the purpose of the artifact, how it was used, and the people or decision it supported.
Full name of the authorized organization evaluator
Work email address of the authorized organization evaluator
Role, organization, and relationship to the contributor
### Completion decision - **Redo (R):** Any R on either Artifact Element returns the Training Unit for redo. - **Pass (P):** Both Artifact Elements achieve P or D and all required attestations are complete. - **Distinction (D):** Both Artifact Elements achieve D against approved LMO-reposited D criteria. AC003–AC007 are attestations. They confirm authenticity, context, domain, source, or use as applicable; they are not graded and do not own R, P, or D criteria. No formal Assessment Method is attached at TI or TU level.
- or -

Powered by

CanCred Factory logo